<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mac Virus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The Official Mac Virus blogsite</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-adware apps out for a Googly by David Harley</title>
		<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/2013/03/14/anti-adware-apps-out-for-a-googly/#comment-3537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Harley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/?p=2379#comment-3537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe it or not, I actually considered that, but wasn&#039;t sure I could manage it without mentioning APTs. Or being accused of spin doctoring. ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, I actually considered that, but wasn&#8217;t sure I could manage it without mentioning APTs. Or being accused of spin doctoring. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-adware apps out for a Googly by Kevin Townsend</title>
		<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/2013/03/14/anti-adware-apps-out-for-a-googly/#comment-3536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/?p=2379#comment-3536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I await with baited breath your next pun on cybercricket – the wrong&#039;un, better known as the Chinaman.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I await with baited breath your next pun on cybercricket – the wrong&#8217;un, better known as the Chinaman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sophos Threat Report by David Harley</title>
		<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/2012/12/07/sophos-threat-report/#comment-3528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Harley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/?p=2194#comment-3528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You mean Mobile Device Management? I&#039;m sure it&#039;s up to Sophos&#039; usual high standards, but I&#039;m afraid I haven&#039;t got the time and resources to test corporate software here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean Mobile Device Management? I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s up to Sophos&#8217; usual high standards, but I&#8217;m afraid I haven&#8217;t got the time and resources to test corporate software here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sophos Threat Report by Angela Giraldo</title>
		<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/2012/12/07/sophos-threat-report/#comment-3526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angela Giraldo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 05:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/?p=2194#comment-3526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Sophos good to run in iPad iOS 6.1.2?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Sophos good to run in iPad iOS 6.1.2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The drawbacks of fuzzy filtering by The Real Nirv</title>
		<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/2013/02/28/the-drawbacks-of-fuzzy-filtering/#comment-3416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Nirv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/?p=2346#comment-3416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the typos above, too rushed I suppose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the typos above, too rushed I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The drawbacks of fuzzy filtering by The Real Nirv</title>
		<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/2013/02/28/the-drawbacks-of-fuzzy-filtering/#comment-3415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Nirv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/?p=2346#comment-3415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to highlight a specific aspect of Apple&#039;s approach, that their service is offered within a certain conduct as outline in their service agreement. I agree that automating a process, like email filters, can put into jeopardy content that is not necessarily in the spirit of Apple&#039;s service agreement. That being said, and I most certainly see your point on human observation, it does seem to be as balanced as it might be. Granted we are not in a position to evaluate their work-flow on how they filter but in consideration of how many users they have on iCloud it would be a daunting task and prohibitively expensive to source this to human based analysis.

Personally, I was unaware of Apple&#039;s approach until I read about it a few days ago and am pleasantly surprised that Apple just blocks such material from being delivered to me. They could have taken the approach of sending it anyway and then it landing in my junk folder as spam and allowing me the opportunity but this would run the risk of their users, who can be Windows or Mac based to find malware attached.

Not being American either I personally and preferably prefer to view this as part of a good security policy and not censorship per se. Unfortunately, from a monetary position, Apple can&#039;t employ heads for the task of tagging email, nor does the industry at large have the capacity to do so. In hindsight, Apple could allow customers to do one of a few things, allow emails from specific recipients to pass through without filtering and or allow emails in general to arrive in the junk mailbox folder if they would otherwise hit the tag.

Ultimately though I would conclude by simply saying that Apple is hosting the service and it&#039;s free. As the host of a service, it generates a community and within the bounds of that community, it lays down rules that it deems appropriate within the law and within general internet etiquette. Where the law is concerned, Apple has no choice but to position the bounds of the service but within it. Apple as a public company is also bound to position the service to reflect it&#039;s code of conduct or ethical demeanour.

I sincerely appreciate the dialogue. It was interesting to revisit this topic and reflect on what it means to the user. I am sure I could have left something to be desired. Please leave me any further comments, I&#039;ll be happy to digest them…take care :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to highlight a specific aspect of Apple&#8217;s approach, that their service is offered within a certain conduct as outline in their service agreement. I agree that automating a process, like email filters, can put into jeopardy content that is not necessarily in the spirit of Apple&#8217;s service agreement. That being said, and I most certainly see your point on human observation, it does seem to be as balanced as it might be. Granted we are not in a position to evaluate their work-flow on how they filter but in consideration of how many users they have on iCloud it would be a daunting task and prohibitively expensive to source this to human based analysis.</p>
<p>Personally, I was unaware of Apple&#8217;s approach until I read about it a few days ago and am pleasantly surprised that Apple just blocks such material from being delivered to me. They could have taken the approach of sending it anyway and then it landing in my junk folder as spam and allowing me the opportunity but this would run the risk of their users, who can be Windows or Mac based to find malware attached.</p>
<p>Not being American either I personally and preferably prefer to view this as part of a good security policy and not censorship per se. Unfortunately, from a monetary position, Apple can&#8217;t employ heads for the task of tagging email, nor does the industry at large have the capacity to do so. In hindsight, Apple could allow customers to do one of a few things, allow emails from specific recipients to pass through without filtering and or allow emails in general to arrive in the junk mailbox folder if they would otherwise hit the tag.</p>
<p>Ultimately though I would conclude by simply saying that Apple is hosting the service and it&#8217;s free. As the host of a service, it generates a community and within the bounds of that community, it lays down rules that it deems appropriate within the law and within general internet etiquette. Where the law is concerned, Apple has no choice but to position the bounds of the service but within it. Apple as a public company is also bound to position the service to reflect it&#8217;s code of conduct or ethical demeanour.</p>
<p>I sincerely appreciate the dialogue. It was interesting to revisit this topic and reflect on what it means to the user. I am sure I could have left something to be desired. Please leave me any further comments, I&#8217;ll be happy to digest them…take care <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The drawbacks of fuzzy filtering by David Harley</title>
		<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/2013/02/28/the-drawbacks-of-fuzzy-filtering/#comment-3410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Harley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/?p=2346#comment-3410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those points are made either in the article or in the links included. My point isn&#039;t really about censorship - not being American, I don&#039;t think my rights are infringed if Internet traffic is filtered within reason. :) Rather, that there&#039;s too much traffic to filter without automation, and automated processes make mistakes a human observer wouldn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those points are made either in the article or in the links included. My point isn&#8217;t really about censorship &#8211; not being American, I don&#8217;t think my rights are infringed if Internet traffic is filtered within reason. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Rather, that there&#8217;s too much traffic to filter without automation, and automated processes make mistakes a human observer wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The drawbacks of fuzzy filtering by The Real Nirv</title>
		<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/2013/02/28/the-drawbacks-of-fuzzy-filtering/#comment-3409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Nirv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/?p=2346#comment-3409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://therealnirv.wordpress.com/2013/03/01/399/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Real Nirv&lt;/a&gt; and commented: 
Apple is filtering emails that you send but this is nothing new actually. It&#039;s in their icloud terms of service. They have given themselves the option of blocking material that you send by blocking it from even getting to the destination, so your recipient will not see your email in the junk mailbox, it&#039;s simply stopped.

You can test this by creating an email to yourself and from yourself, try it. The email addresses for the to and fro have to be an @me.com, @mac.com or @icloud.com domain. If in the subject field or in the body of the message you include something like, &quot;Barely legal teens&quot; it will take a while to go out and then it appears to go out but will not come back.

You can read Apple&#039;s iCloud terms of service here: http://www.apple.com/legal/icloud/en/terms.html

You will notice that in the section titled;

Your Conduct

You agree that you will NOT use the Service to:

in particular, subsection f appears to explain why such an email can not go out.

f. post, send, transmit or otherwise make available any unsolicited or unauthorized email messages, advertising, promotional materials, junk mail, spam, or chain letters, including, without limitation, bulk commercial advertising and informational announcements;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://therealnirv.wordpress.com/2013/03/01/399/" rel="nofollow">The Real Nirv</a> and commented:<br />
Apple is filtering emails that you send but this is nothing new actually. It&#8217;s in their icloud terms of service. They have given themselves the option of blocking material that you send by blocking it from even getting to the destination, so your recipient will not see your email in the junk mailbox, it&#8217;s simply stopped.</p>
<p>You can test this by creating an email to yourself and from yourself, try it. The email addresses for the to and fro have to be an @me.com, @mac.com or @icloud.com domain. If in the subject field or in the body of the message you include something like, &#8220;Barely legal teens&#8221; it will take a while to go out and then it appears to go out but will not come back.</p>
<p>You can read Apple&#8217;s iCloud terms of service here: <a href="http://www.apple.com/legal/icloud/en/terms.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/legal/icloud/en/terms.html</a></p>
<p>You will notice that in the section titled;</p>
<p>Your Conduct</p>
<p>You agree that you will NOT use the Service to:</p>
<p>in particular, subsection f appears to explain why such an email can not go out.</p>
<p>f. post, send, transmit or otherwise make available any unsolicited or unauthorized email messages, advertising, promotional materials, junk mail, spam, or chain letters, including, without limitation, bulk commercial advertising and informational announcements;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple, Microsoft and Facebook in the same boat by Johan</title>
		<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/apple-microsoft-and-facebook-in-the-same-boat/#comment-3362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/?p=2332#comment-3362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LoL with this line &quot;and the Life of (Apple) Pie&quot;  you made me hungry for some Apple pie, it&#039;s time for some baking I guess! Cheers :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LoL with this line &#8220;and the Life of (Apple) Pie&#8221;  you made me hungry for some Apple pie, it&#8217;s time for some baking I guess! Cheers <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple sails away from Java (plug-ins) by Khürt Williams</title>
		<link>http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/2013/02/20/apple-sails-away-from-java-plug-ins/#comment-3345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khürt Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macviruscom.wordpress.com/?p=2324#comment-3345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://khurtwilliams.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/5219/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Khürt/blog (Wordpress.com)&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://khurtwilliams.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/5219/" rel="nofollow">Khürt/blog (WordPress.com)</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>